![]() This study did not receive any funding Author Declarations The authors have declared no competing interest. Our study highlights a need for revising pandemic policies through a feminist lens. Yet there were relevant differences in the responses to increased violence and reproductive rights, ranging from some support measures in Australia to an abortion ban in the US. All healthcare systems failed to protect women’s health and essential public health targets. Intersecting gender inequalities were reinforced, sexual violence increased and women’s leadership was weak. Pandemic policies strongly cut into women’s health, constrained prevention and support services and weakened reproductive rights, while essential maternity care services were kept open. We found similar trends across countries. Three sub-goals of SDG 5 were analysed: maternity care and reproductive health, gender-based violence, and gender equality and women’s leadership. ![]() Australia, Brazil, Germany, the United Kingdom and USA were selected, reflecting upper-middle and high-income countries with established public health and gender policies but different types of healthcare systems and epidemiological and geo-political conditions. We apply a qualitative comparative approach, drawing on secondary sources and expert information material was collected from March to July 2022. Our study explores health system responses to gender equality goals during the COVID-19 pandemic and inclusion in future policies. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted healthcare and societies, exacerbating existing inequalities for women and girls across every sphere. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |